Knowledge, Perception, and Attitude towards Pulp Revascularisation among Dental Students and Private Practitioners: A Questionnaire-based Study
Sandhiya Chakkaravarthy *
CRI, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital,Melmaruvathur, 603319, Tamil Nadu, India.
A. Vasanthakumari
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Melmaruvathur, 603319, Tamil Nadu, India.
A. Selvabalaji
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Melmaruvathur, 603319, Tamil Nadu, India.
V. Ramesh
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Melmaruvathur, 603319, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramanandvignesh Pandiyan
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Melmaruvathur, 603319, Tamil Nadu, India.
M. Nisha
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Melmaruvathur, 603319, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aims: To assess awareness, clinical understanding, and attitudes toward pulp revascularisation among dental students and private practitioners.
Study Design: Original study.
Methodology: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among 196 respondents. The questionnaire included demographic details and items assessing familiarity with pulp revascularisation, indications, clinical protocol, materials used, perceived reliability, barriers to practice, and educational needs. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and expressed as frequencies and percentages.
Results: Most participants were younger than 24 years (76.5%) and female (61.7%). Although 70.9% were somewhat or very familiar with pulp revascularisation, only 27.0% had actually performed the procedure. Immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp were correctly identified as the most suitable indication by 41.0% of respondents. Limited clinical exposure (44.4%) and lack of knowledge (25.5%) were the most frequently reported barriers.
Conclusion: The findings reveal moderate theoretical awareness but limited clinical exposure to pulp revascularisation. Incorporation of hands-on workshops and clinical postings into undergraduate and postgraduate training could improve competence and acceptance of regenerative endodontic procedures.
Keywords: Pulp revascularisation, regenerative endodontics, knowledge attitude perception, dental students, survey