Survey Questionnaire: Perio-Esthetics in Periodontology of PG Students Perspectives
M M Dayakar *
Department of Periodontology, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, India.
Shilpa L S
Department of Periodontology, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, India.
Vidyalakshmi.S.Rao
Department of Periodontology, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, India.
Aishwarya Bruhanmath
Department of Periodontology, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, India.
Soumya Reddy
Department of Periodontology, S B Patil Dental College and Research, Bidar, India.
Sarja Ishwarya
Department of Periodontology, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Background: Periodontal esthetics has become an essential component of modern periodontology, reflecting a shift toward patient-centered care that emphasizes both functional and esthetic outcomes. Despite increasing demand for esthetic periodontal procedures, challenges related to patient awareness, cost, and training exposure may influence their adoption in routine practice. Understanding postgraduate students’ perspectives is crucial for identifying educational gaps and future directions in perio-esthetics.
Aim: To assess the perceptions of postgraduate students in Periodontology regarding challenges in patient motivation, adequacy of training resources, clinical confidence in perio-esthetic procedures, and views on the present and future scope of perio-esthetics in India.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 114 postgraduate students in Periodontology across multiple dental institutions in India. A validated, self-administered questionnaire comprising 10 close-ended questions evaluated patient-related challenges, procedural confidence, training adequacy, preferred learning resources, advanced technologies, cost-effectiveness, and future outlook. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and chi-square tests were applied to assess the distribution of responses, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: Lack of patient awareness (48.2%) and high treatment cost (29.8%) were identified as the major barriers to patient acceptance. Crown lengthening was the procedure in which students reported the highest confidence, while confidence in advanced soft tissue grafting was limited. Training resources were perceived as inconsistently sufficient across institutions. Most respondents anticipated moderate to high growth of perio-esthetics in India over the next decade, with lasers and microsurgical instruments considered the most useful advanced technologies.
Conclusion: Postgraduate students perceive perio-esthetics as a promising and expanding domain within periodontology; however, limited patient awareness, economic constraints, and variable training exposure hinder its optimal clinical integration. Strengthening postgraduate training, enhancing patient education, and emphasizing cost-effective approaches may improve the adoption and outcomes of perio-esthetic care in India.
Keywords: Perio-esthetics, periodontology, postgraduate students, patient awareness, periodontal education, esthetic periodontal procedures