Asian Journal of Dental Sciences

Extraction Vs Non-Extraction / the Debate Continues: A Review

Deepak Mohan Soni *

CHC Kuthera, Directorate of Dental Health, Shimla, Health and Family Welfare Department, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Rajeev Sharma

PHC Summerkot, Directorate of Dental Health, Shimla, Health and Family Welfare Department, Himachal Pradesh, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

The decision to extract teeth for orthodontic treatment is one of the most debated subjects in the history of the specialty. Angle advocated non-extraction while case a few years later proposed extraction in selected cases because of the concern for stability. In the 1930s, many practitioners began to observe generalized relapse with non-extraction treatment. Charles H. Tweed used cephalometric analysis to support the extraction of all four first premolars and initiated a swing among the orthodontic community toward extraction therapy.

The popularity of extraction therapy lasted well into the 1970s. During the 1980s, the pendulum swung back toward non-extraction, and that trend persisted until the end of the century. The resurgence of non-extraction therapy is probably the result of many factors, including the renewed popularity of early intervention, a greater acceptance of functional appliances in the United States, and the change from fully banded appliances to direct-bonded brackets. Finally, a consumer-driven market for treatment without extractions, combined until recently with a conspicuous lack of experimental evidence to support either position, has ultimately kept the extraction-non-extraction debate at the forefront of orthodontic concerns. The last two decades has seen noticeable decline of extraction in orthodontic treatment. This is augmented with increased pressure from the referring dentist to treat the patient without extraction treatment modality, being unaware of the literature supportive of extractions in specific cases. The controversy becomes even greater when dealing with borderline cases. In a respected specialty such as orthodontics, the decision to extract or not should, at least in part, be based on scientific assessments of treatment outcome. This review provides a summary of historical background of the controversy, the view points of various authors, the reasons for decline in extractions and the present understanding of the debate.

Keywords: Orthodontic cases, extraction, non-extraction, debate, current view

---

---

---

References

Saghafi N, Heaton LJ, Bayirli B, Turpin DL. Influence of clinicians’ experience and gender on extraction decision in orthodontics. Angle Orthodontist. 2017; 87(5):641–50.

Guez C, Jackson TH, Lin FC, Profitt, WR, Ko CC. Extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic in the 21st century: demographic and diagnostic factors affecting the likelihood of extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017; 151(3):456–62.

Kirschneck C, Proff P, Reicheneder C, Lipold, C. Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy—a retrospective cohort study. Clin O Invest. 2016; 20(4):865–74.

Herzog C, Konstantonis D, Konstantoni N, Eliades T, Zurich. Arch-width changes in extraction vs nonextraction treatments in matched class I borderline malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.2017;151(4):735–43.

Hunter J. The Natural History of the Human Teeth: Explaining their Structure, Use, Formation, Growth, and Diseases. Uk: London Publishers; 1865.

Wahl N. The last graduate. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists Bulletin .1988;60:37 42.

Case CS .The question of extraction in orthodontia. Trans NDA-reprinted. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1911-reprint 1964; 50(9):660-91.

Tweed CH. Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod O surg. 1944;30(8):405-28.

Simms MR . P Raymond (1898-1983). Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1983; 83(5):445-6.

Little RM, Riedel RA, Wallen TR . Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment– first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1981; 80(4):349-65.

Little RM, McReynolds DC. Mandibular second premolar extraction-postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1991; 61(2):133-44.

Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr, Paquette DE. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(1): 1-14

Busch LS, Dibagno DA, Rinchuse DJ, Cozzani M. Extraction treatment Part 1- The Extraction vs. Nonextraction Debate. J Clin Orthod. 2014; 48(12):753-60.

Meydrech EF, Rushing SE, Silberman SL, Tuncay OC. How dentists perceive the effects of orthodontic extraction on facial appearance. Journal of American Dental Association.1995;126(6):769-72.

Behrents RG, Boley JC, Stephens CK, Alexander RG, Bushang PH. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128(4):450-7.

Dandajena TC, Erdinc AE, Nanda RS. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007; 132(3): 324–31.

Guiterrez-Pulido L, Marasco R, Solem RC. Threedimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(2):218–28.

Burrow SJ. To extract or not to extract: a diagnostic decision, not a marketing decision. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(3):341–2.

Dorfman HS. Mucogingival changes resulting from mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1978;74(3):286–97.

Sarver DM . The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: The smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120(2):98-111.

Konstantonis D, Papageorgiou SN, Vasileiou D, Eliades T. Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: A systematic review and meta analysis. Euro J Oral Sci. 2018;126(3):167 79.

Ioi H, Kang S, Shimomura T, Kim S, Park S, Son W, Takahashi I. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;142(4):459 65.

Manton DJ, Meyer AH, Woods MG. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(2):207 16.

Anderson CK, Boffa J, Gianelly AA Longitudinal evaluation of condylar position in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;100(5):416 20.

Bowman SJ. More than lip service: Facial esthetics in orthodontics. Journal of American Dental Association. 1999;130(8):1173 81.

Erdinc AE, Işiksal E, Nanda RS. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006;129(6): 775 84.

Kocadereli I, Meral GD, Saysel MY et al. The effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulations. Angle Orthodontist. 2005;75(5):719 22.

Türköz C, Ulusoy C. Effect of premolar extraction on mandibular third molar impaction in young adults. Angle Orthodontist. 2013;83(4):572 7.

Altieri F, Cassetta M, Di Mambro A. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molar: A retrospective study. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2013;18(4):564 8.

Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr., Sigler LM et al. Changes in occlusal relationships in mixed dentition patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion. A prospective clinical study. Angle Orthodontist. 2010; 80(2):230 8.

Currier GF, Housley JA, Nanda RS et al. Stability of transverse expansion in the mandibular arch. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124(3):288 93.

Ackerman M, Sonis A. E space preservation: Is there a relationship to mandibular second molar impaction? Angle Orthodontist. 2011; 81(6):1045 9.

Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr., Rubin RL. Mandibular second molar eruption difficulties related to the maintenance of arch perimeter in the mixed dentition. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012;141(2): 146 52.

Akan S, Germec Cakan D, Taner TU. Arch width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010;137(6): 734.e1 7.

Chen SS-H, Greenlee GM, Kim J-E et al. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010;137(6): 726.e1-726.e18.

Currier GF, Hatch NE, Marshall SD et al. (Self-ligating bracket claims. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010;138(2):128–31.

Daskalogiannakis J. Glossary of Orthodontic Terms. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing, IL; 2000.

Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y et al. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1984;86(2):95-111.

Forrest JL. Evidence-based decision making: a translational guide for dental professionals. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health / Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.